 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: Traditional Epistemology and Epistemology Naturalized Author(s): CARLSON, Matthew Journal: Logique et Analyse Volume: 256 Date: 2021 Pages: 449-466 DOI: 10.2143/LEA.256.0.3290353 Abstract : In this paper, I develop a new interpretation of Quine’s epistemology with the aim of clarifying the relationship between naturalized epistemology and traditional epistemology. Quine’s naturalized epistemology is commonly criticized on the grounds that it amounts to giving up on traditional epistemological projects in favor of projects in natural science. But, I argue, this criticism rests on a mistaken interpretation of Quine’s epistemology. This is because Quine’s naturalized epistemology retains an important meliorative component; part of its aim is to improve our systems of beliefs. Quine’s approach emphasizes improving our beliefs by engaging in conceptual clarification, which is a central part of both traditional and naturalized epistemology, as well as, on Quine’s conception, scientific inquiry. Thus, I argue, a central task of naturalized epistemology is to clarify science from within. Once this is properly understood, it is evident that Quine’s naturalized epistemology constitutes a re-orientation, rather than a wholesale rejection, of the projects of traditional epistemology. |
|
