 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: Ramifications of Imposing Uniform Responsibility on Collective Action Author(s): PAYETTE, Gillman Journal: Logique et Analyse Volume: 243 Date: 2018 Pages: 237-268 DOI: 10.2143/LEA.243.0.3285129 Abstract : The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of van Hees and Braham’s conception of causal responsibility in terms of NESS-conditions in formal models of collective action; NESS means ‘Necessary Element of a Sufficient Set’. In particular, the paper looks at their dictatorship result which arises from imposing uniform responsibility on game forms which are augmented with a probabilistic component. Analogs for uniform NESS-responsibility are formulated within Belnap et al.’s stit models of agency — for both the instantaneous and past-looking versions. In the case of instantaneous stit theory, NESS-responsibility has dstit as a special case, and the probabilistic component is unnecessary for deriving a full dictatorship result. For past-looking agency, NESS-responsibility has astit as a special case, but uniformity, while not dictatorial, is shown to have a counterintuitive necessary condition: busy choosers. |
|
