 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: Against Logical Inferentialism Subtitle: Stipulation, Rules and the Mushroom Omelette Objection Author(s): ZANGWILL, Nick Journal: Logique et Analyse Volume: 255 Date: 2021 Pages: 275-287 DOI: 10.2143/LEA.255.0.3290191 Abstract : I argue against inferentialism about logic. First, I argue against an analogy between logic and chess, before considering a more basic objection to stipulating inference rules as a way of establishing the meaning of logical constants. The objection - the Mushroom Omelette Objection - is that stipulative acts are partly constituted by logical notions, and therefore cannot be used to explain logical thought. I then argue that the same problem also attaches to following existing conventional rules, since either those rules have logical contents, or following those conventional rules is done for logical reasons. Lastly, I compare this argument with other arguments found in Quine’s early work, and consider two attempts to reply to Quine. |
|
