 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: Vrije wil en morele verantwoordelijkheid in theorie en praktijk Author(s): DE MESEL, Benjamin Journal: Tijdschrift voor Filosofie Volume: 80 Issue: 1 Date: 2018 Pages: 131-147 DOI: 10.2143/TVF.80.1.3284818 Abstract : In this article, I discuss Gerbert Faure’s Vrije wil, moraal en het geslaagde leven (Free Will, Morality, and the Well-lived Life). I summarize and elucidate Faure’s argument. My criticisms are directed primarily at the first chapter of the book, in which Faure develops what he regards as a Strawsonian account of free will and moral responsibility. Faure denies that we have free will; I argue that Strawsonians should not deny this. Faure argues that, although we do not have free will, it is often justified to hold others responsible, because we owe it to the victim(s) of a wrong to hold the perpetrator responsible; it is our moral duty. I argue that we only have a moral duty to hold perpetrators responsible if they are morally responsible. I also comment on the way in which Faure presents Strawson’s distinction between theory and practice. |
|
