 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
|
Document Details : Title: Response to Reidar Lie Author(s): KIMSMA, Gerrit Journal: Ethical Perspectives Volume: 4 Issue: 4 Date: December 1997 Pages: 274-279 DOI: 10.2143/EP.4.4.562992 Abstract : I disagree with what Reidar Lie has presented here, not because his presentation is deficient, but because the philosophy of the relationship between physician and patient is too narrow. First of all he paints a one-sided and distorted picture of American formulations and descriptions of the concept of autonomy, especially one aspect of it: informed consent. He concludes that autonomy is not an adequate basis for understanding the medical relationship. And then he ends his paper in a vacuum: a proposal to actively explore and experiment with new ways of seeing and modelling this (physician-patient) relationship without a program or a script, based on Foucault’s description of the relationship between knowledge and power. That statement causes some suspicion, because it is this relationship that was part of the abuse of patients and research subjects in the first place. |
|
