previous article in this issue | next article in this issue |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: The Return to Proto-Mark Subtitle: A Response to David Neville Author(s): BURKETT, Delbert Journal: Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses Volume: 85 Issue: 1 Date: 2009 Pages: 117-134 DOI: 10.2143/ETL.85.1.2040698 Abstract : In my book Rethinking the Gospel Sources: From Proto-Mark to Mark, I presented evidence for a new theory of Synoptic relations, in which all three Synoptics depended on earlier sources, including some form of a 'Proto-Mark'. My arguments for this theory have been criticized in two articles by David Neville. Neville’s criticisms fall into three categories: general criticisms, criticisms of my evidence against direct dependence of one Synoptic on another (Chapters 2 and 3 of my book), and criticisms of the constructive portion of my book. An examination of his critique suggests that it does not damage my case as much as Neville supposed. Ultimately, Neville’s disagreements with my work are less significant than his agreements. We both recognize that theories of Markan or Matthean priority have had their day and that future progress in solving the Synoptic Problem will require a hypothesis of some form of Proto-Mark. |
|