this issue
previous article in this issuenext article in this issue

Document Details :

Title: A Symposium on the Minor Agreements
Author(s): NEIRYNCK, F.
Journal: Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses
Volume: 67    Issue: 4   Date: December 1991   
Pages: 361-372
DOI: 10.2143/ETL.67.4.556024

Abstract :
On the invitation of Professor G. Strecker, and under his chairmanship, a group of New Testament scholars met in Göttingen, July 26-27, 1991, for a Symposium on the Minor Agreements. The program comprised five main papers each followed with a response by one of the participants and a general discussion, in this order: F. Neirynck, The Minor Agreements and the Two-Source Theory (response by D.B. Peabody); M.D. Goulder, Luke's Reconciliation of the Order of Mark and Matthew (response by D.L. Dungan); W.R. Farmer, The Minor Agreements and the Two Gospel Hypothesis (Response by U. Luz); A. Fuchs, Mk 4,35-41 parr (response by W. Schenk); C.M. Tuckett, The Minor Agreements and Textual Criticism (response by F. Wheeler). The main options with respect to the minor agreements were represented at the meeting: on the one hand, priority of Mark and independent redaction by Matthew and Luke (Neirynck); priority of Mark and Luke's dependence on Matthew (Goulder); priority of Mark and the hypothesis of a Deutero-Mark, source of Matthew and Luke (Fuchs); priority of Mark occasionally combined with a deuteromarkan recension and oral-tradition variants (Luz); and, on the other hand, the neo-Griesbachian hypothesis of Markan posteriority: Matthew is copied by Luke and both are conflated in Mark (Farmer). Tuckett's paper concentrated on the possibility of conjectural emendation, particularyly in the case of Mt 26,68.

Download article


3.238.134.157.