 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
|
Document Details : Title: Athanasius' Son of God Author(s): MEYER, J.R. Journal: Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales Volume: 66 Issue: 2 Date: 1999 Pages: 225-253 DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.66.2.530066 Abstract : The Alexandrian theologian Origen wrote that God the Father exceeds the Son in a way that surpasses the Son’s own transcendence of creation, and he apparently did so in order to oppose those who disregarded Jesus’ statement that «the Father is greater than I» (Jn. 14:28). Just a few years after Origen’s death, however, when correction of his Son of God theology was well underway, Arius radicalized the latent subordinationism present in Origen’s thought by placing the Son among created things. The Arian tendency to associate the Son with the created realm can be traced back to the attempts of Methodius of Olympus and Eusebius of Caesarea to counter Origen’s doctrine of eternal creation. Arius claimed that Christ is called «Son» because he is the created instrument of God’s will, and he gained sympathy for this voluntaristic view by citing John 14:28. Here was irrefutable scriptural proof of the metaphysical priority of the Father over the Son who is a separate and yet perfect creature of God (κτίσμα γάρ ἐστι καὶ ποίημα υἱὀς). |
|
