 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
|
Document Details : Title: Een kritische analyse van de pluralistische interreligieuze dialoog vanuit een particularistisch perspectief. Author(s): MOYAERT, Marianne Journal: Bijdragen Volume: 65 Issue: 2 Date: 2004 Pages: 189-208 DOI: 10.2143/BIJ.65.2.504387 Abstract : Even though most people nowadays endorse to the necessity and importance of interreligious dialogue, opinions differ concerning the precise interpretation of the dialogic event. The most fundamental issue remains the dialogical tension between identity and alterity. How can we combine the engagement of religious faith with the openness to the other? At first sight, the pluralistic theology offers the most acceptable answer to this question. Pluralists are convinced that the success of the interreligious dialogue depends on the readiness of the religious traditions and their adherents to abandon all absolute truth claims. However, the pluralistic project is criticized heavily due to a lack of consideration for the particularity of the religious identity. Many believers do not recognize themselves in the pluralistic interpretation of their religion. In the following article I will (1) first explain the basic principle of the pluralistic epistemology, (2) next I will establish the pluralistic contribution to the interreligious dialogue. In (3) third instance, I will formulate some specific Christian critics to the pluralistic project, which can be traced back to a lack of insight in the particularity of the religious identity. In fourth instance (4) I will try to elucidate this assessment by clarifying some aspects of religious identity. I conclude (5) with the position that, if interreligious dialogue wants to be an event between believers of different religious traditions and not in the first place between academics, it should abandon the pluralistic discourse and accept the truly irrevocable religious diversity. |
