this issue
previous article in this issuenext article in this issue

Document Details :

Title: Ten years single-centre experience with intra-aortic balloon pump
Author(s): G. Vandenplas , T. Bové , F. Caes , Y. Van Belleghem , K. Francois , F. De Somer , Y. Taeymans , G. Van Nooten
Journal: Acta Cardiologica
Volume: 66    Issue: 6   Date: 2011   
Pages: 707-713
DOI: 10.2143/AC.66.6.2136953

Abstract :
Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the patient characteristics and outcomes in 1406 patients undergoing intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation.
Methods: Between 1998 and 2008, 1406 consecutive patients were recorded in a prospective database. Based on the main clinical indication for IABP use, we defined 3 groups: group A, 630 cases of coronary ischaemia or infarction without serious left ventricular (LV) dysfunction; group B, 466 patients with left ventricular failure or cardiogenic shock; group C, 310 patients where IABP was used for miscellaneous procedures such as weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass or during high-risk angioplasty or surgery.
Results: Global mortality was 28% (n = 390), with a significant difference between group A (15%, n = 95) and group B (41%, n = 191) (P < 0.001). Mortality in group C was 34% (n = 104). Most insertions were done in the catheterization laboratory (n = 943) with subsequent mortality of 23% whereas 199 balloons were inserted in the operation room with 34% mortality. 170 balloons inserted in the intensive care unit resulted in 46% mortality (P < 0.001). Major IABP-induced complications were 6.8% with no statistical differences between the three groups. Advanced age, left ventricular failure and low BMI were identified as prognostic risk factors for early mortality.
Conclusions: IABP deployed at an early clinical stage yields the best results, especially for acute coronary patients with preserved LV function whereas LV failure and late insertion result in worse outcome.