|previous article in this issue||next article in this issue|
Document Details :
Title: Matching Well-Being to Merit
Subtitle: The Example of Punishment
Author(s): WATKINS, Jeremy
Journal: Ethical Perspectives
Volume: 18 Issue: 1 Date: 2011
In this paper, I explore our common-sense thinking about the relation between moral value, moral merit, and well-being. Starting from Ross’s observation that welfarist axiologies ignore our intuitions about desert, I focus on axiologies that take moral merit and well-being to be independent determinants of value. I distinguish three ways in which these axiologies can be formulated, and I then consider their application to the issue of punishment. The objection that they recommend penalties in circumstances in which intuitively we would judge them to be unjustified is examined, and I suggest that it can be met by incorporating temporal information into the way in which value, well-being and moral merit are linked.