this issue
previous article in this issuenext article in this issue

Document Details :

Title: Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a large tertiary hospital: differences between wards and results of a hospital-wide intervention
Author(s): PIERS RD, BENOIT DD, SCHRAUWEN WJ, VAN DEN NOORTGATE NJ
Journal: Acta Clinica Belgica
Volume: 66    Issue: 2   Date: 2011   
Pages: 116-122
DOI: 10.2143/ACB.66.2.1002927

Abstract :






Background: Despite the advent of palliative care, the quality of dying in the hospital remains poor. Differences in quality of end-of-life practice between hospital wards are well known in clinical practice but rarely have been investigated. Methods: A prospective observation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions was conducted in patients dying in a Belgian university hospital before (115 patients) and after (113 patients) a hospital-wide intervention consisting in informing hospital staff on the law on Patient’s Rights and the introduction of a new DNR form. The new DNR form puts more emphasis on the motivation of the DNR decision and on the description of the participants in the decision-making process. Results: The completion of DNR forms improved after the intervention: physicians better documented who participated in DNR decisions (for participation of family: 63% after the intervention vs. 44% before the intervention, p = 0.022, for nurses: 27% vs. 14%, p = 0.047) and the motivation for these decisions (59% vs. 32%, p = 0.001). However, there was no difference in referral to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the end of life (in 40% of patients after and 37% before the intervention). Furthermore, the number of patients dying without DNR form on the wards was similar (13% and 8%). Surgical patients and patients with non-malignant diseases were more often referred to ICU at the end of life (71% in surgical vs. 35% in medical patients, p < 0.001 and 49% in patients with non-malignant diseases vs. 23% in patients with malignancy, p < 0.001). Moreover, surgical patients less frequently received a DNR order (56% in surgical vs. 92% in medical patients, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The introduction of a new DNR form and informing hospital staff on patients’ right to information did not improve physicians’ end-of-life practice. Transition from life-prolonging treatment to a more palliative approach was less anticipated in surgical patients and patients with non-malignant diseases.