 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel Subtitle: A New Proposal Author(s): WEREN, Wim J.C. Journal: Biblica Volume: 87 Issue: 2 Date: 2006 Pages: 171-200 DOI: 10.2143/BIB.87.2.3189038 Abstract : The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras, whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as 'hinge texts'. The following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17; 26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function: a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to the preceding block. It is especially these 'hinge texts' that underline the continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much on alleged caesuras. |
|
