 previous article in this issue | next article in this issue  |
Preview first page |
Document Details : Title: The Burden of Autonomy Subtitle: Non-combatant Immunity and Humanitarian Intervention Author(s): CORNWELL, William Journal: Ethical Perspectives Volume: 12 Issue: 3 Date: September 2005 Pages: 341-355 DOI: 10.2143/EP.12.3.2004486 Abstract : Michael Walzer argues that except in cases involving genocide or mass slaughter, humanitarian intervention is unjustifiable because “citizens get the government they deserve, or, at least, the government for which they are ‘fit.’” Yet, if people are autonomous and deserve the government that rules over them, then it would seem that they are responsible for the government’s actions, including their nation’s wars of aggression. That line of thought undermines the doctrine of noncombatant immunity, which is perhaps the most important of Walzer’s jus in bello principles. In this way, the concept of self-determination frustrates Walzer’s attempts to keep jus ad bellum and jus in bello considerations separate. |
|
